
Reading Time: 14 minutes 9 seconds
BY: Tami Nealy
DATE: 2025-12-05
Artificial intelligence has moved from novelty to infrastructure in less than three years. It now shows up in everything from watch faces to workout apps, and it has inevitably raised a question inside our industry: Will AI replace personal trainers?
ISSA’s 2025 “Human Advantage” survey of 90 students and graduates, combined with external labor, technology, and consumer research, points to a clear answer: AI is transforming the work of trainers, but it is not replacing them. It is amplifying the value of certified professionals.
Key findings from ISSA’s survey of certified and aspiring fitness professionals include:
AI is already embedded in professional practice. Just over half of respondents (about 52%) use AI tools daily or several times a week in their fitness or coaching work.
Efficiency gains are significant. More than 70% report that AI has at least slightly improved their efficiency or productivity as professionals, with roughly one-third describing the impact as “significant.”
Trainers expect AI to increase the value of certification, not erode it. Nearly two thirds (64%) believe AI will increase the value of being a certified personal trainer over the next five years, compared with only about 13% who expect it to decrease.
The profession remains deeply human. Respondents repeatedly identified accountability, empathy, behavioral coaching, mental health support, and real-time form correction as aspects of their work that “cannot be replaced” by AI. A deep understanding of the human body, how it moves and functions, is a fundamental advantage that personal trainers bring, and this expertise cannot be replicated by AI.
Clients are curious but not AI-obsessed. About 64% of trainers say their clients have not raised AI at all. Where they do, the trainer’s role is often to contextualize digital tools and reinforce the value of a human coach.
AI is more often a back-end assistant than a front-end coach. Many trainers use AI for programming ideas, marketing copy, scheduling, and content creation, while keeping direct coaching, cueing, and relationship-building firmly human.
These insights sit against a strong macro backdrop. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics projects employment of fitness trainers and instructors to grow 12% between 2024 and 2034, far outpacing the 3.1% growth expected across all occupations.Bureau of Labor Statistics. At the same time, the global AI personal trainer market is forecast to nearly double from roughly $16.9 billion in 2025 to over $35 billion by 2030, a compound annual growth rate of about 16%.
Taken together, the data tells a simple but powerful story: AI will not replace trainers. Trainers who learn to use AI well will replace those who do not.
The fitness and wellness sector is undergoing simultaneous shifts. On one side, demographic, economic, and clinical trends are increasing demand for qualified professionals who can support healthspan, not just weight loss. On the other, AI, wearables, and digital platforms are reshaping how people discover, access, and measure fitness.
The personal trainer career path is not one-size-fits-all; many individuals pursue it as a way to achieve their dream job in fitness. There is an abundance of job opportunities in the fitness industry, including roles with leading fitness companies, ranging from management and entrepreneurship to specialization and consulting, offering diverse options for those interested in building a fulfilling career. The field also offers significant career growth for those who pursue advanced education or specialization
According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, employment of fitness trainers and instructors is projected to grow 12% from 2024 to 2034, categorized as “much faster than average” compared with all occupations.. This growth is driven by:
Ongoing recognition of the benefits of physical activity for chronic disease prevention and mental health
An aging population seeking to maintain independence and function
Rising consumer interest in personalized wellness experiences
Many personal trainers find employment in fitness centers and health clubs, where compensation is often calculated per hour and can vary based on experience and credentials.
This expansion creates significant opportunities for new trainers to enter the fitness industry and advance their careers, whether by starting out, moving into management, opening a business, or specializing further in their field.
In other words, while AI is capturing headlines about job displacement, official labor projections point to expansion, not contraction, in the personal training workforce.
Technology is not standing still. A 2025 market forecast estimates that the AI personal trainer segment will grow at nearly 16% CAGR through 2030, driven by smart wearables, app-based coaching, and real-time feedback systems. Athletech News’ Technology & Innovation Outlook 2024 similarly highlights how AI, wearables, and continuous monitoring are powering more “hyper-personalized” wellness experiences and reshaping fitness business operations.
Meanwhile, McKinsey’s 2023 global AI survey found that about one-third of organizations already use generative AI in at least one business function, with executives themselves reporting regular use.
For fitness professionals, this convergence of job growth and digital acceleration creates a pivotal question: What does “being a trainer” look like in a world where AI can write programs, analyze data, and send reminders at scale?
To stay relevant, trainers must prepare for ongoing technological advancements by developing a new skill set that includes digital literacy and adaptability.
To better understand this question from the inside out, ISSA fielded The Human Advantage: How Fitness Professionals Are Using AI survey in late October 2025.
Sample size: 90 respondents
Audience: ISSA students and graduates, representing a mix of Certified Personal Trainers (CPTs), Nutritionists, and other specializations
Experience levels:
31% with 1–3 years in the industry
28% with less than one year
Nearly 40% with 4+ years, including a meaningful cohort (over 20%) with 8 or more years of experience
Roles:
44% independent trainers/coaches
20% gym or studio employees
14% online/virtual coaches
The remainder split between gym owners, hybrid roles, and those actively building their businesses
Business model mix:
43% operate 100% in-person
24% are mostly in-person
18% run a 50/50 hybrid
About 12% are mostly or entirely online
The result is a snapshot of a profession that is still rooted in live, human interaction, but increasingly operating in a hybrid physical–digital environment.
When asked, “How frequently do you use AI tools in your fitness or coaching practice, whether to work directly with clients or to run your business?” respondents reported:
Daily: ~26%
Several times a week: ~27%
A few times a month: ~16%
Rarely: ~12%
Never: ~19%
In other words, just over half of respondents (about 52%) use AI at least several times per week, while about one in five have not used AI at all. This distribution mirrors patterns seen in broader industries, where a significant minority of professionals become early, frequent users while a sizable tail remains cautious or late to adopt.
When asked what prompted them to explore AI tools, trainers pointed to two primary drivers:
Curiosity: Roughly 39% said they began experimenting with AI simply to “see what it could do.”
Business efficiency: About 34% cited a desire to save time or automate tasks.
Smaller segments pointed to competitive advantage, cost savings, or education-based exposure. A handful of respondents expressed principled resistance, describing AI as something they prefer to avoid except for basic research.
This mix reflects a profession that is neither blindly embracing nor uniformly rejecting AI. Instead, trainers are testing tools pragmatically, with a clear eye toward time, efficiency, and client value.
While the survey included detailed multi-select questions about use cases, responses and open-ended comments highlight several recurring themes:
Program design support: Using AI as a “second brain” to brainstorm variations, progressions, or adaptations for specific constraints, and to help trainers create and adapt fitness programs for clients.
Content & marketing: Drafting emails, posts, and educational content more quickly, then editing for tone and accuracy.
Administrative support: Scheduling, reminders, templated responses, and data organization.
Education: Using AI tools to explore new research, terminology, or coaching frameworks, then validating against trusted sources and ISSA content.
One respondent summed it up simply: “AI is great for programming, but it can’t watch someone’s squat or ask how their week really went.”
When asked, “How has AI impacted your efficiency or productivity as a fitness professional?” respondents reported:
Significantly improved: 32%
Slightly improved: 39%
No change: 20%
Taken together, just over 70% say AI has improved their efficiency, even if only modestly. Trainers describe shaving time off programming, content creation, and admin work, which can be reinvested into higher-value activities like client communication, continuing education, and business development.
On the question of “measurable changes” in business or client outcomes since using AI, responses were more mixed:
Around 17% said they have seen clear improvements in client outcomes (for example, better consistency, more goals hit).
About 12% reported measurable improvements in business performance, such as more clients, higher revenue, or better lead conversion.
Another 29% reported minor improvements or said it was “too early to tell.”
Nearly 19% indicated the question was not applicable because they do not use AI regularly enough.
This pattern suggests AI’s impact is clearest on internal productivity today, with external outcomes still emerging and unevenly measured. That is consistent with broader enterprise data, where organizations report early productivity gains before fully quantifying downstream revenue or outcomes.
If AI is becoming a powerful assistant, what remains uniquely human in the coaching relationship?
Open-ended responses to “What aspects of your work do you believe cannot be replaced or replicated by AI?” and “Do you believe AI poses a threat to human coaching relationships? Why or why not?” converged around several themes.
One key aspect is motivating clients to achieve their goals, a uniquely human skill that involves personalized encouragement, support and understanding which AI cannot replicate.
Trainers describe their work as:
Holding clients accountable in ways that adapt to mood, life events, and motivation
Reading body language, energy levels, and emotional cues
Building long-term trust that allows for honest conversations about barriers and setbacks
Comments included references to “the mental health side of my business,” “face-to-face coaching,” and the simple reality that “my clients don’t want to work with AI.” Trainers see themselves not as content providers but as behavior change partners.
This aligns with broader consumer research. Deloitte’s 2024 survey on AI in healthcare found that 74% of U.S. consumers still trust clinicians most for health information, far more than AI tools, even as people increasingly use digital channels to supplement their knowledge.
Several respondents emphasized that AI can suggest exercises, but it cannot physically observe and correct form in the moment, nor can it adjust on the fly when something “looks off.”
Real-time movement quality, safety, and load management require eyes on the person, not just eyes on the plan. Trainers are responsible for enforcing safety rules and providing aid when necessary to ensure client well-being during sessions. In addition, trainers are expected to be trained in CPR so they can respond to emergencies that may arise during exercise sessions. This is particularly relevant as AI fitness tools scale, and as emerging research points to risks when generic AI recommendations fail to account for individual physiology or context. Recent coverage of gender gaps in AI-driven fitness models, for example, highlights potential safety issues when systems are trained on male-centric data that do not reflect female athletes’ needs.
A small but vocal subset of respondents expressed skepticism or outright resistance to AI, describing it as “trash” outside of research or insisting they prefer to think critically through programming without algorithmic shortcuts. Even among more enthusiastic users, there is a clear boundary: AI is a tool that supports a distinctly human craft.
The unifying theme: clients hire trainers for transformation, not just information. AI can help structure information more efficiently; transformation remains human. A successful trainer combines technical expertise with empathy and adaptability to deliver personalized results.
When asked how AI will affect the value of being a certified personal trainer over the next five years, respondents answered:
Greatly increase the value: 40%
Somewhat increase the value: 24%
No major change: 16%
Somewhat decrease the value: 8%
Greatly decrease the value: 6%
That means roughly 64% believe AI will increase the value of certification, compared with only about 13% who expect it to decrease.
The logic is straightforward: as AI becomes more accessible to the general public, clients will need trusted experts who can:
Interpret and filter AI-generated information
Integrate data from wearables and apps into coherent, personalized plans
Provide ethical boundaries and safety checks
Coach behavior, mindset, and adherence over time
In this environment, certification functions as a signal of competence and accountability, not a barrier to technological progress. Employers prefer candidates with accredited certifications when hiring personal trainers, making certification even more important in the job market.
On a broader sentiment question, “How do you currently feel about the growing use of AI in the fitness industry?” trainers responded:
Cautiously optimistic – helpful but needs boundaries: 33%
Very optimistic – it will enhance the profession: 24%
Neutral: 17%
Concerned – it could reduce the role of trainers: 14%
Skeptical – overhyped and short-lived: 3%
So while over half describe themselves as optimistic, a meaningful minority remain concerned or skeptical, particularly around the risk of AI being positioned as a substitute for human coaching rather than a support tool.
This mirrors broader public attitudes. National surveys show that while many Americans use AI-enabled products in their daily lives, a majority remain wary of its broader societal impact and want guardrails.
Despite the headlines, most clients are not showing up asking to be coached by AI. When trainers were asked, “Have your clients expressed interest or concerns about AI in fitness or coaching?” the responses were:
Not at all: 64%
Mixed reactions: 19%
Yes, mostly interest: 6%
Yes, mostly concern: 3%
In other words, AI is far more visible in industry conversations and investor decks than it is in the average client session.
At the same time, consumer research outside fitness shows growing use of AI in health and wellness. A 2025 survey cited by The Vitamin Shoppe found that 35% of Americans are using AI to manage aspects of their health, including researching conditions, planning meals, and exploring new exercise routines.
This gap creates an important opportunity: trainers can serve as translators and filters, helping clients navigate AI health information, separate signals from noise, and integrate digital tools in ways that support, rather than derail, long-term habits.
When asked whether they recommend AI tools for clients to use alongside coaching:
No — I prefer clients focus on human-led guidance: 34%
Not yet, but I’m open to it: 31%
Occasionally recommend tools for specific goals: 16%
Frequently integrate AI tools into programs: 11%
Rarely mention them: 6%
The center of gravity today sits with cautious openness rather than aggressive promotion. Trainers are still testing where AI adds genuine value versus distraction. Calorie-tracking apps, habit trackers, and wearable-driven analytics surfaced most often in qualitative responses as useful adjuncts, not replacements.
The combined picture from labor projections, technology forecasts, consumer attitudes, and ISSA’s own data suggests several clear implications.
First, the demand for qualified personal trainers will continue to grow as more people prioritize health and wellness.
Second, technology will play an increasingly important role in how trainers interact with clients and deliver services.
Third, ongoing education and certification will be essential for trainers to stay competitive and meet evolving industry standards. Many personal trainers hold a bachelor's degree or a degree in exercise science, physical education, or a related specialized field, which can enhance their credibility and qualification standards. Advanced knowledge in exercise science and sports medicine can also open doors to specialized roles and career advancement within the fitness industry.
Additionally, career advancement in the fitness industry can open doors to management roles such as fitness director. In these positions, professionals may oversee the operations of a fitness center or health club, manage and train staff, and ensure the smooth running of daily activities. For entrepreneurial trainers, there is also the opportunity to open or run a health club, taking on responsibilities that include staff development, equipment management, and business growth.
As AI tools proliferate, the average consumer will be confronted with more information, more recommendations, and more automated “coaches” than ever before. In that environment, certification becomes more, not less, important as a marker of:
Evidence-based practice
Ethical boundaries
Understanding of anatomy, physiology, and behavior change
Ability to critically evaluate AI-generated suggestions
ISSA’s survey shows trainers recognize this: the majority expect AI to increase the value of being certified.
The most effective professionals will not just use AI; they will help shape how it is used. That means:
Providing feedback to tech partners on what actually helps clients versus what confuses or overwhelms them
Advocating for inclusive datasets that reflect diverse bodies, ages, and abilities
Insisting on safety and transparency in algorithmic recommendations
The recent spotlight on gender data gaps in AI fitness tools is a reminder that nothing about AI is neutral. Human expertise must stay in the loop.
The future is unlikely to be fully virtual or fully in-person. ISSA’s respondents already operate in a spectrum from 100% in-person to 100% online, with a sizable hybrid middle. That hybrid model will mature into a new standard where:
AI and digital platforms handle routine tasks and data crunching
Trainers focus on high-value human work: assessment, cueing, coaching, and relationship
Clients experience a more continuous, personalized, and responsive form of support
In this model, trainers may deliver services through group fitness, group classes, and group fitness classes, both in traditional gyms and in fitness studios. Training clients in various formats, including one-on-one and group settings, is a key part of the evolving personal training landscape.
In this model, AI enhances the trainer’s capacity, but the trainer remains the architect of the client experience.
The story emerging from ISSA’s AI survey is neither utopian nor alarmist. It is grounded and pragmatic.
AI is already embedded in how many trainers work, particularly around efficiency and back-end tasks.
The majority of ISSA-trained professionals expect AI to increase the value of their credentials and their role.
Clients still overwhelmingly look to human professionals for trust, accountability, and real-world results, even as they adopt digital tools to manage aspects of their health.
The labor market is projected to add, not subtract, jobs for fitness trainers over the coming decade.
The real question, then, is not whether AI will replace trainers. It is whether trainers, education providers, and industry leaders will intentionally design for a future where technology and human expertise work together in service of better health outcomes.
ISSA’s position is clear:
Certification is the foundation. It ensures that the person behind the screen, the program, or the plan understands the science and ethics of training.
AI is a powerful amplifier. Used well, it can extend reach, unlock new insights, and free up time for deeper coaching.
The human advantage endures. Empathy, judgment, and relationship remain at the center of sustainable change.
As AI evolves, ISSA will continue to champion a simple principle: the future of fitness is human-led and tech-enabled, not the other way around.
Tami Nealy is the VP of Communications at the International Sports Sciences Association (ISSA), a global leader in online fitness certification. She oversees brand positioning, media relations, and strategic content across ISSA’s portfolio of health and wellness education brands. With more than 20 years of experience in public relations and brand storytelling, Tami specializes in translating industry trends into clear, actionable insights that support aspiring and ISSA-certified personal trainers, health coaches, and nutrition professionals in building successful wellness careers. She is also an adjunct professor at Grand Canyon University where she teaches in the College of Business.